Not viewing this page correctly? Clear your browser cache!

Habitat

April 8, 2011

How a developing country could defend against tsunamis

contributor: Rob Goodier

stairs

ASME gave an overview of the tsunami defenses in Japan, and we asked a structural engineer for tips on how prepare in a developing country. Photo courtesy of ASME

The tsunami that the Tohoku quake triggered off the coast of Japan struck a country that was unusually prepared for that kind of disaster, if not for one of that magnitude. Japan’s low-lying coast bristles with fortified vertical evacuation buildings, steel platforms raised on columns, and sea walls. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers outlines the country’s defenses in a new investigative news article on tsunami evacuation, “Tsunami Forces Debate over Vertical Evacuation.”

For the first time, a US community is discussing investment in a tsunami-resistant building, the article explains. The debate, as always, turns on money. If that kind of investment makes some US taxpayers balk, what should coastal communities in developing countries do to prepare for disaster?

We put the question to Ian Robertson, a structural design professor at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Robertson is a member of the university’s Tsunami Engineering Research Initiative, he helped write the FEMA P646 guidelines for vertical construction for tsunami evacuation, and he lives in a state that has a vested interest in tsunami defense. He gave us an overview of what could work best on a budget, and what’s probably not worth the money.

Education is number one

What’s the best, and probably the cheapest, tsunami defense? Robertson’s answer was one that could put a few structural engineers out of a job: “Public education,” he said.

“There were thousands of lives lost in Japan, but if people hadn’t evacuated, they would have lost a million,” Robertson said. Widespread public education campaigns had trained people to head for high ground when they felt a quake, and that took hundreds of thousands of people beyond the reach of the wave.

Assess what you have

To establish defenses on a budget, experts should first evaluate which, if any, of the structures they already have could stand up to a tsumani.

Some bridges may be out of harm’s way, for example. And some buildings may serve as evacuation points. “For a 12-story building that’s designed for high-seismic activity, you wouldn’t have to pay anything to accomodate for a tsunami,” Robertson said.

Tasukaru Tower is a tsunami evacuation point in Japan. Photo courtesy of ASMEDouble up and don’t retrofit

One Japanese tsunami defense is raised steel platforms, as the ASME article points out. Those may be cheaper than tsunami-resistant construction in the short run, but Robertson doesn’t recommend those.

He has two reasons: Anything built just for tsunami evacuation will sit around unused for most, or all of its lifespan. And that’s a waste.

The second reason is that the towers have a certain height, and it’s hard to predict how high a tsunami might be. People in thirty-foot towers could die in a big enough wave. A high rise, on the other hand, is almost certain to stand above the water. Instead, communities on a budget should build high-rise hotels, apartments and office buildings that double as fortified evacuation points.

The community should invest in tsunami-proof construction before the first shovel breaks soil. Retro-fitting an existing building is costlier, Robertson said.

A government could incur the extra cost of fortifying a private building against tsunami, Robertson suggested. That way, a hotel owner wouldn’t have to pay out of pocket to protect the community, and the community would have an evacuation point.

Caveats

Robertson’s recommendations come with a warning: When preparing for a tsunami, you have to be right about its size. “What we saw in Japan was more than anybody anticipated, even them,” he said. “We know so little about tsunamis. The Japanese certainly didn’t know what to expect.”

That may be the best reason why the most effective life savers could be good education and a plan to head for high ground.

Resources

Disaster preparedness apps
Tsunami Engineering Research Initiative at the University of Hawaii
Tsunami Forces Debate over Vertical Evacuation – ASME.org

tags : Ian Robertson, infrastructure projects, tsunami defense, tsunamis, University of Hawaii

Rob Goodier

April 8, 2011

Leave a Comment

Logged in as . Log out?

Your comment is now being held for moderation. Please check back again later to see your comment below.

    by engineers.
    for everyone.

    E4C Membership is a curated experience! When you become a member, we will tailor a unique user profile for you based on the way you engage with our content over time. Your actions and preferences will allow us to serve you content that is most relevant to you. In addition, becoming an E4C member grants you access to exclusive engagement opportunities and the E4C newsletter.

    Join E4C and become a part of a global community that believes engineering can change the world!

    Become a Member